Home › How We Work
We diagnose before we propose.
Institutions arrive asking for one thing — usually an accreditation deadline — and frequently discover the binding constraint is somewhere else entirely. Careerantra runs the diagnostic as a separate, paid engagement precisely so its findings are not shaped by what we would like to sell afterwards. Below is the full process flow, stage by stage, including the points at which you can stop.
The process flow
Seven steps from first enquiry to annual reset. Five decision gates, all of which are yours. Roughly one in five enquiries ends at the first gate because we tell the institution it does not need us.
What actually happens, in order
Every engagement runs these seven steps regardless of which services you take. The only variable is how many services run in parallel at step five.
- 01
45 minutes · no cost
Enquiry and discovery call
You send a brief describing what is blocking you. We reply within two working days and put the relevant service lead — not a salesperson — on a forty-five minute call. We ask what you have already tried, what your deadline is, and who inside the institution sponsors the work. That last question predicts more about whether an engagement succeeds than anything else.
What we need to start
- Your written brief, describing the constraint rather than the service
- Any prior report, submission or score sheet you are willing to share
What comes out
- Written note back stating which service fits and who would lead it
- An honest view on whether we are the right firm for this
- Indicative diagnostic cost and timeline
GateProceed to diagnostic? Entirely yours. About one enquiry in five ends here because the answer is that you do not need us, or that an existing vendor should be kept.
Who is involved: Your Vice-Chancellor, Registrar or IQAC coordinator, plus one Careerantra service lead.
- 02
2–4 weeks · paid, standalone
Diagnostic
Three to five days on campus and the rest inside your data. We score the institution against whichever frameworks matter to you, interview the leadership team, heads of department and a cross-section of faculty, and — the part that matters most — reconcile every number you report against the record behind it. A diagnostic run on a prepared summary spreadsheet tells you nothing you did not already believe.
What we need to start
- Access to real records: HR data, publication record, audited accounts, student returns
- A nominated coordinator with authority to obtain documents
- Two to three hours of leadership time across the period
What comes out
- Written diagnostic report with a projected outcome
- Framework-wise gap list, ranked by points recoverable against effort required
- Data integrity findings — where claimed figures do not match source records
- Recommendation on which services to start with, including where you need none
GateFindings are presented to your management before any proposal is written. You may stop here and act on the report internally. Several institutions have, and the report is yours either way.
Who is involved: Vice-Chancellor or Principal, Registrar, IQAC coordinator, Dean of Research, finance office.
- 03
2–3 weeks
Roadmap and proposal
A sequencing workshop with your leadership turns the diagnostic into a plan. This is where transformation programmes are won or lost: research output cannot be raised in the same quarter a ranking submission is due, and an evidence repository has to exist before an SSR can be drafted. We map those dependencies openly, including the ones that push your desired timeline out.
What we need to start
- Accepted diagnostic report
- Your target outcome and the date attached to it
- Budget envelope, so we scope to it rather than around it
What comes out
- Three-year roadmap with quarterly milestones and named owners
- Service-wise scope documents stating exactly what is and is not included
- Dependency map across services
- Commercial proposal with payments tied to deliverables, not to months elapsed
- Honest estimate of the effort required from your staff
GateGo or no-go on each service individually. Services can be deferred or dropped without renegotiating the rest of the engagement.
Who is involved: Leadership team plus the nominated coordinator for each service under consideration.
- 04
1–2 weeks
Agreement and mobilisation
The unglamorous step that decides whether the next two years run smoothly. An account director is assigned and named in the engagement letter. Service leads are introduced to their counterparts. Your coordinators are nominated in writing. Access is provisioned, the tracker is set up, and the escalation route is agreed before anyone needs it.
What we need to start
- Signed engagement letter
- Nominated coordinator per service, in writing, with time allocated
- System and record access provisioned
What comes out
- Engagement letter naming the account director and every service lead
- Responsibility matrix per service — who does what, on both sides
- Live project tracker your team can open at any time
- Escalation route, in writing, with a named partner above the account director
- First ninety-day plan
GateMobilisation checklist signed off by both sides. If coordinators are not nominated, we do not start. An unstaffed engagement fails slowly and expensively, and we would rather have that argument in week one.
Who is involved: Account director, all assigned service leads, your Registrar and service coordinators.
- 05
Month 3 onward
Deployment
Service leads execute their phases. Each phase ends with a named deliverable that your team reviews before the next begins — so a problem surfaces at the end of a phase rather than at the end of a programme. The account director resolves contention when two leads need the same registrar in the same week, which happens more often than anyone expects.
What we need to start
- Mobilisation complete
- Coordinator availability at the agreed cadence
- Timely review of deliverables — the commonest cause of slippage is a document sitting unreviewed
What comes out
- Named deliverables per the service scope
- Monthly steering minutes recording decisions, not attendance
- Live tracker and maintained issue log
- Immediate flag on anything that puts a milestone at risk
GatePhase-end review on every phase. The deliverable is accepted, revised, or the phase is re-planned. Nothing rolls forward silently.
Who is involved: Service leads, your service coordinators, department heads, account director.
- 06
Every quarter
Quarterly review
A formal review against the roadmap's stated targets — including what did not happen and why. We report variance with causes rather than a status colour. Where the cause sits on our side we say so; where it sits with an unstaffed coordinator or an unreviewed document, we say that too.
What we need to start
- The quarter's completed deliverables
- Variance data against roadmap targets
- Ninety minutes of your management committee's time
What comes out
- Quarterly progress report for management or the governing body
- Variance analysis with causes attributed honestly
- Revised plan for the coming quarter
- Updated risk register
GateContinue, re-scope, pause or stop. Stopping is a legitimate outcome — if a service is not delivering, we would rather end it and refund the undelivered portion than keep billing against a failed plan.
Who is involved: Management committee or governing body, account director, service leads as required.
- 07
Annual
Annual reset, handover or exit
A three-year plan written once and never revisited is a document, not a programme. Frameworks are revised, your staffing changes, and the constraint moves. Each year we re-run a shortened diagnostic and reset the plan — and progressively hand capability to your own staff so that the second year needs less of us than the first.
What we need to start
- Twelve months of delivery history
- Willingness to name internal owners for the capability being handed over
What comes out
- Annual re-diagnostic report and revised roadmap
- Handover pack: documented processes, templates and standard operating procedures
- Trained internal owners for each transferred capability
- Decision on renewal, retained advisory or clean exit
GateRenew, move to retained advisory, or exit. On exit you keep every document, template and process. Nothing is held back to make you dependent.
Who is involved: Vice-Chancellor, account director, internal capability owners.
Who does what
Consulting engagements fail on unclear division of labour more than on capability. This is the split, step by step.
The operating rhythm
Once deployment starts, this is the meeting load. It is deliberately light: institutions do not have spare hours, and a programme that consumes them in meetings will be quietly abandoned.
The five decision gates
Every gate is yours, not ours. You can stop at any of them, and at three of them you keep a usable deliverable whether or not you continue.
After discovery
Proceed to a diagnostic, or not. No cost incurred either way.
After the diagnostic
Commission a roadmap, or take the report and act on it internally. The report is yours regardless.
After the proposal
Go or no-go on each service individually. Defer or drop any service without renegotiating the others.
At each phase end
Accept the deliverable, ask for revision, or re-plan the phase. Nothing rolls forward silently.
At each quarterly review
Continue, re-scope, pause or stop. On stopping, the undelivered portion is refunded.
How the engagement is governed
Accountability is the part institutions complain about most with consultants, so it is built into the structure rather than promised in a meeting.
One lead per service
Each service is owned end to end by a named specialist — scoping, delivery, escalation and the quarterly report. You are never routed to a shared inbox, and you always know whose name sits against a missed date.
One account director
Above the service leads, named in your engagement letter. Chairs the monthly review, sequences work across services, and answers to your management for the whole programme including the parts that went wrong.
Decisions, not status
Steering minutes record decisions and owners. A meeting that produces neither is cancelled the following month.
Single escalation route
If a service lead is not delivering, you raise it once with the account director. If the account director is the problem, you raise it with the partner named in your engagement letter.
Engagement models
Four ways to work with us. Most institutions begin with the first and move to the second or third once a deliverable has landed.
Single service
3–18 months
One service, one lead, defined scope and deliverables. The most common starting point.
- Institutions with one pressing constraint — an accreditation deadline, a flat research figure, an AI policy gap.
Service bundle
12–24 months
Two to four services sequenced together where they share data, faculty or dependencies.
- Institutions where the presenting problem turns out to have its cause in a different service.
Transformation partnership
3 years
The full portfolio, sequenced by a single roadmap, with quarterly governing-body review.
- Institutions with a stated three-year target — a grade, a ranking band, an NIRF entry.
Retained advisory
Annual
A standing relationship after a programme completes: quarterly review, framework change monitoring, service leads on call.
- Institutions that have built the capability and need it maintained rather than rebuilt.
What we need from you
Engagements stall on this list more often than on anything we do. It is worth reading before you commit.
Sponsorship at the right level
Every service names the level it needs — Registrar, Vice-Chancellor, Dean. Engagements sponsored below that level stall, and we would rather say so before starting than three months in.
Access to real records
Not summaries. The actual HR data, the actual publication record, the audited accounts.
A nominated coordinator
One person per service with the authority to obtain records and the time allocated to do it. The single strongest predictor of whether an engagement delivers.
Protected faculty time
Particularly for Faculty Development and Research & Publication Excellence. Programmes scheduled on top of a full teaching load produce attendance and no output.
Timely review of deliverables
A document sitting unreviewed for three weeks moves every downstream date by three weeks.
Tolerance for uncomfortable findings
The diagnostic will surface numbers that do not reconcile and processes that exist only on paper. That is what you are paying for.
Commercial principles
How we price, and what that means for you.
- Scope and cost are agreed in writing before work starts, with payments tied to deliverables rather than months elapsed.
- The diagnostic is priced and invoiced separately, so its findings are not shaped by what we would like to sell afterwards.
- We take no commission on hardware, software, cloud or publisher procurement, and we will tell you when the right answer is to buy nothing.
- We will advise against a service you do not need, and say when an existing vendor should be kept rather than replaced.
- If a service is not delivering, we would rather stop it and refund the undelivered portion than continue billing against a failed plan.
- On exit you keep every document, template and process. Nothing is withheld to create dependency.
What we will not do
The lines we hold across every service.
- We do not write papers for faculty to sign, and we do not place work in predatory or delisted journals.
- We do not create accreditation evidence for activities that did not happen.
- We do not inflate ranking submissions. Corrected data, never invented data.
- We do not fabricate, complete or adjust research datasets to reach a desired result.
- We do not guarantee a grade, a rank, an acceptance or a sanction. Anyone who does is either lying or buying.
When we stop an engagement
We would rather end an engagement cleanly than bill against a plan that cannot work.
- Coordinators are not nominated, or are nominated without time allocated, and remain so after two escalations.
- Access to source records is withheld, which makes any finding we produce unreliable.
- We are asked to produce evidence for activities that did not happen, or to inflate a submission.
- Internal sponsorship is withdrawn, which usually means the programme has been overtaken by something else.
- External change makes the agreed target unachievable. We re-scope to a realistic one, or we stop and refund the undelivered portion.
Step one takes forty-five minutes.
Send a brief describing what is blocking you. We reply within two working days with which service fits, who would lead it, and whether we are the right firm for it.